Wrong scheme for the project
Applications fail early when the project does not match the scheme's eligibility — tenure, unit mix, price caps or borrower profile.
End-to-end application and documentation facilitation
Development finance from institutions such as Family Homes Funds (FHF), the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN), the Bank of Industry (BOI) and similar bodies is won on the strength of the application: a bankable feasibility, clean documentation and financial statements that stand up to scrutiny. We facilitate the process end to end — from scheme selection to application, documentation and follow-through to decision.
Applications fail early when the project does not match the scheme's eligibility — tenure, unit mix, price caps or borrower profile.
A sales brochure is not a feasibility. Institutions want cost build-ups, phasing, absorption assumptions and sensitivities.
Weak or unaudited accounts, undisclosed obligations or inconsistent figures raise doubts the application cannot recover from.
Every missing title document, consent or tax certificate becomes a query cycle that pushes the file to the back of the queue.
Applications stall between the developer, the institution and third parties when nobody owns the process end to end.
We facilitate the full application journey. Typical scope includes the following.
Mapping the project against FHF, FMBN, BOI and other relevant schemes — terms, eligibility, caps and timelines — and recommending the strongest route. Output: a written scheme assessment and recommended route.
A development feasibility with land cost, construction build-up, professional fees, phasing, sales absorption, pricing and sensitivities, presented in the format institutions review. Output: a feasibility report and financial model.
Compiling and aligning the application: corporate documents, title and consent documents, tax compliance evidence, financial statements, drawings and bills of quantities, with gaps flagged early. Output: a complete, indexed application pack.
Bringing the company's accounts and tax records to the standard the institution will examine, coordinating with auditors where required. Output: a financial position that supports rather than undermines the application.
Submitting, tracking and responding to queries, coordinating site visits and valuations, and keeping every party moving until decision. Output: a managed process with a single owner.
Post-approval preparation: conditions precedent, reporting formats and disbursement documentation so approved funds move without avoidable delay. Output: a conditions-precedent checklist and reporting calendar.
We examine the project, the title position, the company's records and the realistic financing need.
We recommend the scheme or combination of schemes with the strongest fit, and tell you plainly if none fits.
The bankable feasibility and financial model are built or rebuilt to institutional standard.
The application pack is compiled, gap-checked and submitted, with a query-response protocol agreed.
We own the follow-up: queries, valuations, site visits and committee timelines until a decision is issued.
Conditions precedent, drawdown documentation and the reporting rhythm the facility requires.
Preparation is where most engagements are won or lost. The more of this you can gather before we start, the faster the work goes and the more accurately we can scope it.
Funding decisions rest solely with the financing institution. We facilitate a strong, complete and well-followed application; no approval outcome is guaranteed by any adviser, and you should be cautious of anyone who promises one.
We do not publish a price list. The drivers below vary too much between businesses for a published figure to be honest — and a price quoted before an assessment is usually wrong in one direction or the other.
| Factor | How it affects the engagement |
|---|---|
| State of documentation | A project with clean title and current accounts is a shorter engagement than one rebuilding both. |
| Scheme complexity | Multi-institution or blended structures add workstreams and coordination. |
| Quality of existing records | Where accounts or tax records must be reconstructed first, that phase is priced separately. |
| Institution timelines | Committee cycles and valuation queues sit outside our control; we manage the file, not the calendar of third parties. |
We facilitate applications to Family Homes Funds (FHF), the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN), the Bank of Industry (BOI) and other relevant development-finance institutions, matching the scheme to the project. We are independent advisers, not agents of any institution.
No. Decisions rest with the institution. What we control is the quality, completeness and follow-through of the application — which is where most applications fail.
Usually we start by diagnosing why it stalled — scheme fit, feasibility, documentation or follow-through — and then either rebuild the file or advise you honestly that the project is not currently financeable and what would make it so.
Yes, where needed. Bringing the company's accounts and tax position to institutional standard is part of the service, and ongoing accounting can continue under our accounting and bookkeeping service after approval.
Tell us what you are dealing with. We will tell you honestly whether we can help, what it would involve and what it would cost.